Let's at least try, no ?<br>If things really go bad, we can always get back to "registered only".<br>We will have a smaller audience than Wikipedia here, hence less vandals.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2012/8/22 Nocturnal Slacker <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:nocturnal.slacker@hotmail.com" target="_blank">nocturnal.slacker@hotmail.com</a>></span><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div><font face="DejaVu Sans">I have to
disagree. Using Wikipedia's experiences here, it's just too easy
to open the door to abuse and vandalism when you allow anonymous
usage on a wiki. True. It's not that difficult to register, but
it does keep some of the riff-raff out. We don't want to have to
keep a full time staff of moderators running around wasting time
cleaning up messes created by vandals, I wouldn't think.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
<br>
~vtel57<br>
</font><div class="im">
<div><br>
<br>
</div>
On 08/21/12 09:08, Matteo Rossini wrote:<br>
</div></div>
<blockquote type="cite"><div class="im">I
think is a great idea to open the 'discussion' tab of articles to
unregistered users.
<br>
<br>
If a people read an article and see an error, he should notify the
problem without a subscription to wiki, ML or LQ
<br></div><div class="im">
_______________________________________________
<br>
Slackdocs mailing list
<br>
<a href="mailto:Slackdocs@alienbase.nl" target="_blank">Slackdocs@alienbase.nl</a>
<br>
<a href="http://lists.alienbase.nl/mailman/listinfo/slackdocs" target="_blank">http://lists.alienbase.nl/mailman/listinfo/slackdocs</a>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</div></blockquote>
<br>
</div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Slackdocs mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Slackdocs@alienbase.nl">Slackdocs@alienbase.nl</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.alienbase.nl/mailman/listinfo/slackdocs" target="_blank">http://lists.alienbase.nl/mailman/listinfo/slackdocs</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>