[Slackdocs] Suggest an additional namespace for Slackware specific HOWTOs

asteroid asteroid at slackware-fr.org
Wed Aug 22 23:16:21 CEST 2012


> Op 22-8-2012 22:29, asteroid schreef:
> >> Op 22-8-2012 20:42, asteroid schreef:
> >>> Off topic :
> >>>  
> >>>> it would be a good thing to indicate - similarly to 
> >>>> SlackBuilds.org - which version of Slackware it has been tested
> >>>> with / approved for.  
> >>> Let add this to http://docs.slackware.com/wiki:syntax, in the
> >>> "footer" section imho.
> >>>
> >>> What about this page ? We can talk about it in the dedicated talk
> >>> page. 
> >> If you look at http://docs.slackware.com/tag:slackware_allversions
> >> you can see an example of that.
> >> If you add the following string to any page, it will automatically
> >> show up at the above URL:
> >>
> >> {{tag>slackware_allversions}}  
> >>
> >> I intend to create tag pages for all recent versions of Slackware
> >> (and will create more if you would require so).
> >> If you want to indicate that an article is relevant (or the
> >> instructions have only be tested on) for instance Slackware 13.37
> >> and 14.0 then you would add this to your page (ideally all the way
> >> to the bottom but really it can appear anywhere):
> >>
> >> {{tag>slackware_13.37 slackware_14.0}}  
> >>
> >> The overview pages which are automatically going to be populated
> >> will eventually be merged into a real Table of Contents (TOC) for
> >> the Wiki.
> >>
> >> We could start a discussion about what tags are useful - if at all
> >> useful.
> >>
> >> Eric
> > Yes, I think it's a good choice to use tag for know how version the
> > articles is covering. We can add the 64 ones : slackware64_13.37,
> > slackware64_14.0 and a basic, like slackware64_only, and why not a
> > slackware32_only.
> >
> > We will covert all versions with those tag.
> Ideally, you should write documentation for a specific release of
> Slackware, not for a specific architecture.The deciding factor usually
> is sofware versions and library compatibility.
> But, I assume that people will want to write architecture-specific
> articles (I know that I will for sure!) so I propose a different
> approach:
> 
> Instead of a tag like "slackware64_13.37", use two tags:
> "slackware_13.37" and then "x86_64". We can then add the other
> architectures too: "x86", "arm", "s390". That will make it _much_
> easier to search for articles about ARM for instance.
> 
> Eric

I'm sure someone will write a doc to use skype in slackware64, be
patient ;)


More information about the Slackdocs mailing list