[Slackdocs] Suggest an additional namespace for Slackware specific HOWTOs

[asteroid]

> Op 22-8-2012 20:42, asteroid schreef:
> > Off topic :
> >  
> >> it would be a good thing to indicate - similarly to 
> >> SlackBuilds.org - which version of Slackware it has been tested
> >> with / approved for.  
> > Let add this to http://docs.slackware.com/wiki:syntax, in the
> > "footer" section imho.
> >
> > What about this page ? We can talk about it in the dedicated talk
> > page. 
> If you look at http://docs.slackware.com/tag:slackware_allversions you
> can see an example of that.
> If you add the following string to any page, it will automatically
> show up at the above URL:
> 
> {{tag>slackware_allversions}}  
> 
> I intend to create tag pages for all recent versions of Slackware (and
> will create more if you would require so).
> If you want to indicate that an article is relevant (or the
> instructions have only be tested on) for instance Slackware 13.37 and
> 14.0 then you would add this to your page (ideally all the way to the
> bottom but really it can appear anywhere):
> 
> {{tag>slackware_13.37 slackware_14.0}}  
> 
> The overview pages which are automatically going to be populated will
> eventually be merged into a real Table of Contents (TOC) for the Wiki.
> 
> We could start a discussion about what tags are useful - if at all
> useful.
> 
> Eric

Yes, I think it's a good choice to use tag for know how version the
articles is covering. We can add the 64 ones : slackware64_13.37,
slackware64_14.0 and a basic, like slackware64_only, and why not a
slackware32_only.

We will covert all versions with those tag.